Risk Assessment
NEN-EN 689 explained: assessing workplace exposure
NEN-EN 689 is the European standard describing how to assess workers' inhalation exposure to hazardous substances and test it against the occupational exposure limit. In the Netherlands it forms the basis for a defensible exposure assessment under the Working Conditions Decree.
Why a standard for exposure?
Many hazardous substances have a statutory or in-house exposure limit. The question is not only whether you stay below that limit, but whether you can reliably demonstrate it. NEN-EN 689 provides a structured testing strategy for this, so that a favourable snapshot does not wrongly lead to a 'safe' conclusion.
The steps of an assessment
1. Basic characterisation. Map which substances are released, in which tasks, in what quantities and under what conditions. The information in Section 8 of the SDS (exposure limits and exposure controls) connects directly to this.
2. Define the exposure group. Group workers who perform similar tasks and therefore have similar exposure (a Similar Exposure Group). The assessment then applies to the whole group.
3. Test against the limit. NEN-EN 689 uses a statistical test: based on a number of measurements, it judges whether the probability of exceeding the limit is small enough. One measurement below the limit does not prove that you comply.
4. Reassess periodically. Do the substances, quantities, ventilation or working method change? Then the earlier conclusion lapses and a new assessment is needed.
Qualitative assessment as a first step
Not every situation calls for measurements straight away. A qualitative assessment, based on the hazard classification, physical state, quantity and way of working, often already shows where the risk is controlled and where a further, quantitative assessment is needed. NEN-EN 689 and a qualitative approach complement each other: you deploy measurement capacity where it yields the most.
Common mistakes
The most common pitfall is drawing a conclusion from too few measurements, or from a measurement that is not representative of a 'bad day'. A lack of clear exposure grouping also makes an assessment hard to defend in an inspection.
How Chemspark helps
Chemspark records each product's hazard classification, physical properties and exposure limits from the SDS. After a short screening, you set the risk level per product for inhalation, skin and fire & explosion. Where needed, you calculate a Tier-1 estimate per component with ECETOC TRA, against the exposure limit from the SDS. That shows you which exposures are likely controlled and which deserve a further assessment under NEN-EN 689, substantiated and traceable.
Related Articles
Best practices
Workplace instruction cards (WIC): from SDS to an instruction people on the shop floor actually read
A safety data sheet is written for the safety professional, not for the operator opening the drum. Learn what Dutch law asks for, what belongs on a good workplace instruction card, what to leave off, and how to keep your cards up to date.
Best practices
Safety data sheet (SDS): what it is, how to read it, and how to get SDS management under control
A safety data sheet tells you a substance's hazards and how to work with it safely. Learn what's in the sixteen sections, which ones matter most on the floor, and how to keep your SDS management current and traceable.
Regulation
Preparing for a hazardous substances inspection: getting your dossier in order
A visit from the Dutch Labour Inspectorate can be unannounced. If you work with hazardous substances, being ready means an up-to-date, traceable and findable dossier. This checklist covers what the inspector checks and how to prepare.